|
Thursday 11th of April 2019 |
Morning Africa |
Register and its all Free.
If you are tracking the NSE Do it via RICHLIVE and use Mozilla Firefox as your Browser. 0930-1500 KENYA TIME Normal Board - The Whole shebang Prompt Board Next day settlement Expert Board All you need re an Individual stock.
The Latest Daily PodCast can be found here on the Front Page of the site http://www.rich.co.ke
Macro Thoughts |
read more |
|
"if you look at it, you see a dot. That's here That's home That's us On it, everyone you ever heard of, every human being who ever lived, lived out their lives" "The Pale Blue Dot" Africa |
“We succeeded in taking that picture, &, if you look at it, you see a dot. That’s here That’s home That’s us On it, everyone you ever heard of, every human being who ever lived, lived out their lives'' “The Pale Blue Dot” Carl Sagan
|
read more |
|
John Gapper: @Boeing was lured into hubris by its commercial success. It could not believe it had blundered so badly trying to avoid harm @FinancialTimes International Trade |
Boeing has been grounded. The company’s decision last week to cut production of its 737 Max, along with its admission that the aircraft’s anti-stall software contributed to two fatal crashes that together killed 346 people, marked the moment when it finally took responsibility. After the Lion Air crash in Indonesia in October, Boeing decided the problem could be addressed by informing pilots and amending its software. When the Ethiopian Airlines accident followed in March, its initial response was to insist that the 737 Max was airworthy. Global regulators had to intervene to puncture the illusion that it knew best. What took Boeing so long? This is not an idle question, because I made the same mistake in believing after the second tragedy that Boeing and the Federal Aviation Administration could still be trusted to handle matters. Passengers should remain confident about boarding the 737 Max, even before a scheduled software fix, I wrote. That turned out to be wrong, as Boeing and the FAA were forced to retreat. My error was to confuse the general truth that flying has become much safer, thanks to progress in automation, with the particular case of the 737 Max. Boeing’s failure was also human error: it was lured into hubris by its commercial success and safety record. It could not believe it had blundered so badly in trying to avoid harm. With hindsight, the reaction of Boeing and the FAA on the day after the second crash feels absurd. “To date we have not been provided data to draw any conclusions or take any actions,” the FAA declared. As Andrew Blackie, a consultant and former UK crash investigator, says: “You’ve just lost two aircraft in similar circumstances. Why would you still have confidence?” That delusion, which has hurt confidence in both Boeing and the FAA, has broader lessons. Companies in regulated industries employing many specialists such as engineers often find it hard to concede errors promptly, not just because of potential legal liability, but due to faith in their expertise. Carmakers and energy companies are also prone to such blindness. Boeing’s delayed reaction now strikes me as the product of three factors. First, it had a strong recent safety record, including with the 737, the first model of which was launched in 1967. The crashes have raised doubts about whether the FAA delegates too much work on the safety certification of new aircraft models to their makers, but the outcome was not alarming until now. Its record was part of a trend of growing safety, especially among US carriers that often favour Boeing aircraft for their fleets. They had not experienced a fatal accident in the US for nine years before the 2018 death of a passenger partially sucked through a window on a Southwest Airlines flight. That created a temptation to believe that Boeing’s equipment was inherently safe. Second, it was riding high commercially, with its share price rising strongly between October and the second crash. It had made sound strategic moves in its tussle with Airbus, including creating the 787 Dreamliner while Airbus mistakenly built the huge A380. The 737 Max was also selling well, gathering 5,000 orders. Boeing has recently pleased investors by upgrading already certified aircraft with new engines to fly further and more economically — both the 737 Max and the new 777X. The 787 was a success but accumulated $30bn in cash losses because it was a new model with fresh technology, including composite materials. Before the crashes, the Max derivative of the 737 came far cheaper. Third, the MCAS anti-stall software used on the 737 Max to counter a tendency when climbing for it to pitch upwards did not feel to Boeing like a huge experiment. It deliberately kept much of the aircraft like previous models to avoid the need for expensive certification and pilot retraining. Airlines seek “commonality” among models in their fleets to save costs. This turned out to be a tragic misjudgment. Boeing believed pilots would rarely, if ever, be in a position where the software activated, but its reliance on a single sensor, which failed in both crashes, made what was intended as an invisible fix into a dangerous and disruptive force. Boeing failed to anticipate the worst case, or react to what had happened quickly enough. One lesson, says Richard Aboulafia, an aviation analyst at Teal Group, is that Boeing has to refocus on engineering excellence and be less dominated by marketing and sales. That might make it more stringent about technologies with unpredictable outcomes. “This is a great company commercially, but engineering seems to have less priority,” he says. Engineering is essential but the other moral is simpler: recognise when you are wrong. Boeing and the FAA trusted in their mutual safety record and depended on each other for reassurance. When the tragedy happened, they clung to an absence of data rather than using common sense. Boeing will get past this failure: its shares rose last week when the initial analysis of the Ethiopian crash indicated that the 737 Max will be able to fly again once its software has been changed. But it should not forget.
|
read more |
|
18-MAR-2019 :: @Boeing 737 MAX-8, @FlyEthiopian 302, the FAA International Trade |
The lack of touch and finesse displayed by Boeing over the last seven days is mind-boggling. They have stayed resolutely behind the curve from the GET-Go. The Message Boeing sent was the Safety came second, a simply untenable position. Eventually the FAA capitulated and grounded the 737 Max. Ethiopian and its Government acted with a lot of decorum. Concerns about brand damage are overblown. In contrast, Boeing have taken a big hit but more worryingly the corporate’s reactions to a fast moving situation were a D-.
|
read more |
|
Coffee prices are languishing near a 13-year low. Here's a look at who's winning and losing from the rout Commodities |
Coffee has been among the worst-performing commodities in the past few years as the world became awash with beans, and there are few signs of a meaningful rebound any time soon. With arabica languishing near a 13-year low and robusta futures also performing poorly, there are concerns that the industry’s stability is under threat. Here’s a look at who’s winning and losing from the rout, from speculators to coffee-shop customers. The slump means roasters such as the makers of the Maxwell House and Folgers brands, Kraft Heinz Co. and JM Smucker Co., are paying less for their beans. That could benefit margins at companies like Smucker, whose shares have climbed to an one-year high. “There will be some good money made by large roasters,” said Jeffrey Young at consultant Allegra Strategies Ltd. Still, the benefit may be limited. For example, roaster Jacobs Douwe Egberts indicated that it’s passing savings onto its customers. Coffee-shop drinkers are actually paying more for a cup now than they were in 2011 -- an espresso at Starbucks Corp.’s U.K. stores has risen about 20 percent. But that that doesn’t mean they’re necessarily getting a raw deal, Allegra’s Young said. Like every industry, low prices are bad news for producers. In some coffee-growing countries, the market price of arabica is below the cost of production, and it’s hard for farmers to suddenly switch to other crops. That’s because coffee trees last several years once planted. Growers in Vietnam, a key robusta producer, have been hoarding beans while they wait for prices to improve, according to shipper Intimex Group. In Honduras, low prices are preventing growers from harvesting all their crop because they can’t pay pickers or cover the cost of input such as fertilizers, according to the National Association of Coffee Exporters.
Emerging Markets
Frontier Markets
|
read more |
|
Zimbabwe, Russia Sign $4 Billion Platinum Mine Deal By @business via @dailymaverick Africa |
Zimbabwe has signed an agreement with Russia to build a new platinum mine in the southern African country, finalizing a deal that’s stalled since 2014. A deal to develop a new platinum-group metals mine on a prospect held by Great Dyke Investment, a company jointly owned by a Russian state-controlled company and Zimbabwe’s government has been sealed, Polite Kambamura, the nation’s deputy mines minister said. The deal hadn’t progressed since an initial agreement in 2014, Kambamura said, declining to disclose the shareholding structure. He said the mine and associated infrastructure will cost $4 billion. “Two weeks ago we finalized the agreement and the Russians are ready to come on the ground,” Kambamura said in an interview on the sidelines of a conference in Johannesburg. The mine would be built on one of the largest platinum mining concessions in the country. Egypt-based Afreximbank may raise $2 billion to finance building the mine and a smelter at the project, the state-owned Herald newspaper reported last year.
|
read more |
|
Dar es Salaam, a city of six million on the Indian Ocean, is expected to have 10 million within a decade and-according to one speculative scenario-could have more than 70 million by 2100. @NatGeo Africa |
One evening in March, as a warm breeze blew in from the Indian Ocean and the call to prayer from the neighborhood mosque echoed in the twilight, Omari Abdullah sat on a plastic chair outside his home, preparing for his night’s work. Like many in this sprawling seaside metropolis, Abdullah is a migrant—a country boy drawn to life in the big city, who arrived 17 years ago and never looked back. A native of Kigoma, in western Tanzania, he couldn’t afford high school and grew restless with his job on a sunflower farm. So at 20 he made the 800-mile journey on the back of a truck, stayed with a friend until he could find work, and eventually started his own business: a small stand selling french fries—known as chips in this former British colony—on the outskirts of Tandale, one of the city’s largest informal settlements. Scraping by here isn’t easy: Abdullah works seven days a week, often until 2 am, to make a profit that averages around $60 a month. But as he tells it, life is good. “You can build a life in Dar es Salaam if you’re willing to work hard,” he says in Kiswahili. His chips stand would never survive back home, he adds: “In places like Kigoma there isn’t any cash flow. That’s why so many people come here.” Abdullah’s tale exemplifies a much larger story, one playing out in cities all across Africa. Africa today is the world’s least urbanized continent, with 43 percent of its population living in urban areas. But high birthrates and rising internal migration mean African cities are entering an era of unprecedented growth. According to U.N. projections, the continent will have 18 cities with more than five million people by 2030, up from eight in 2018. Today 21 of the world’s 30 fastest growing cities, including the top ten, are African. Dar es Salaam—currently Africa’s fifth most populous city—ranks second, behind Kampala in neighboring Uganda. It’s projected to grow from six million people today to 13.4 million by 2035, crossing the “megacity” threshhold of 10 million people sometime before 2030. Until now, however, much of Africa’s urbanization has been what the development economist Paul Collier terms “dysfunctional,” characterized by insufficient infrastructure, a lack of formal jobs, and haphazardly built and often squalid slums. Lack of planning, weak regulations, and, in some countries, the difficulty of obtaining title deeds for land, leads cities to grow out rather than up, making commutes longer and more costly. That disconnects people and companies from jobs and markets, stifling the economy. “Dar es Salaam has one chance to urbanize right,” says Andre Bald, an urban planner and program leader for sustainable development at the World Bank in Tanzania. “Once a city hits ten million people, its trajectory is hard to change. At that stage, it’s very difficult to claw yourself back and do things better.” If Majid bin Said could see Dar es Salaam today, he’d likely be as wide-eyed as Abdullah when he first arrived here from the countryside. As Sultan of Zanzibar, Majid established Dar in 1862 as a plantation town to support his nearby archipelago, which had long been a hub of Indian Ocean commerce. Endowed with a large natural harbor—bandar-as-salaam means “harbor of peace” in Arabic—the new city soon developed a life of its own. It grew rapidly during periods of German and British colonial rule. By 1964 it was the capital and largest city of an independent Tanzania. Mpetula and her colleagues face two familiar impediments: money and politics. Like most countries in sub-Saharan Africa, Tanzania is urbanizing while still poor. According to the World Bank, the region reached a rate of 40 percent urbanization at a GDP per-capita of approximately $1,000. East Asia, by contrast, did so in the 1990s at a GDP per-capita of $3,600. Smaller economies mean less money for investments in housing and infrastructure. According to government statistics, Tanzania, with a population of 60 million, had just 2.6 million formal jobs in 2016. More than half of those workers earned less than the equivalent of $213 dollars per month—hardly enough to afford a formal house, particularly as mortgage rates run 15 to 19 percent. The Center for Affordable Housing in Africa, a Johannesburg-based NGO, estimates that only 2.5 percent of urban Tanzanian households can afford the roughly $16,000 needed for the cheapest formally built home. Tanzanian leaders and their partners are increasingly tackling the city’s greatest environmental challenge: flooding. Dar’s low-lying coastal geography and the polluted Msimbazi River, which slices through its urban core, make it among the most vulnerable cities in Africa. Residents die nearly every year in floods that are only getting worse as climate change increases torrential rains and as the spread of pavement in the sprawling city increases runoff. According to Shahidi wa Maji, a civil society group, nearly a quarter million people along the Msimbazi face serious health risks linked to the river’s “toxic mixture of industrial effluent, chemicals, abattoir waste and human sewage.” It all seeps into homes and drinking water, particularly during floods. Finally I reach the roadside stand where he fries chips on a charcoal grill that glows a deep red in the moonlight. I ask him whether coming here, and hustling for so many years, has been worth it. He smiles and flexes his biceps. “When I arrived I was so thin,” he says. Now, at 37, he’s got a noticeable paunch—a sign, for someone of his background, that he’s made it.
|
read more |
|
25-FEB-2019 :: This is the right move but I would definitely be short at 2.5, if it ever gets there which is entirely unlikely. Africa |
Zimbabwe finally overhauled its dysfunctional,''whack'' and even Voodoo FX regime. Zimbabwe’s government dropped its insistence that a quasi-currency known as bond notes are at par with the dollar as it overhauled foreign-exchange trading and effectively devalued the securities. While the government has previously insisted that bond notes and RTGS dollars are worth the same as U.S. dollars, the units currently trade at between 3.66 and 3.8 to the dollar respectively on the black market [Bloomberg] “The introduction of a Zim dollar will be just in name, but the RTGS$ is essentially the Zim dollar.” Tendai Biti is predicting a 6-8 range whilst the Government is looking for it to appreciate to 2.5 which is best characterised as '''Hail-Mary'' economics. This is the right move but I would definitely be short at 2.5, if it ever gets there which is entirely unlikely.
|
read more |
|
Africa's @amazon #Jumia Is Set for a New York @NYSE IPO as Online Retail Takes Off @business Africa |
When Christophe Fofana, a 29-year-old taxi driver and student in Ivory Coast, needed a birthday present for his daughter last year, he did something he hadn’t done before. He went shopping online. “It was a specific toy, an electric car, that I either couldn’t find in stores or was very expensive,” he said in Abidjan, the commercial capital. He found a gift for the big day on Jumia, the online retailer and market place active in 14 African countries. Fofana is one of more than 4 million customers Jumia Technologies AG has amassed in the seven years since the company was founded, a number that jumped 48 percent last year. The accelerating growth rate has convinced the company’s co-founders, former McKinsey & Co. colleagues Sacha Poignonnec and Jeremy Hodara, to pursue an initial public offering in New York this week. Jumia is planning to sell 13.5 million American Depository Shares at $13 to $16, raising as much as $216 million. The listing is meant to give the company financial flexibility and increase awareness of the brand among investors, the firm said in a regulatory filing last month. Often tagged as Africa’s Amazon.com Inc., Jumia has been able to grow in markets largely untapped by the U.S. heavyweight, which is hampered by a lack of distribution infrastructure on the continent. To tackle the issue of vague addresses in many African cities, Jumia has built a network of leased warehouses, pick up and drop off locations and brought in a string of delivery partners to ensure reliable service. Less than 1 percent of retail sales in Jumia’s African footprint are conducted online compared with nearly 24 percent in China, the company said in the filing, citing Euromonitor International data. That makes the continent ripe for internet sellers as more Africans adopt smartphones and get access to mobile broadband. Jumia’s revenue jumped by almost 40 percent last year to 130.6 million euros ($147.3 million). The company, which has headquarters in Berlin and got early funding from German startup incubator Rocket Internet SE, isn’t profitable. Jumia reported a loss for 2018 of about 170 million euros and has warned prospective IPO investors that it has accumulated losses of 862 million euros since its inception and relies on external financing to compensate for negative cash flow. Still, investors tend to give e-commerce companies leeway because customer growth and market share are seen as more important, according to Seema Shah, a consumer analyst at Bloomberg Intelligence in New York. While the company competes with the likes of Amazon’s Souq.com and Naspers Ltd. in individual markets, Jumia has said it believes it’s the only pan-African e-commerce site. “If an online retailer develops a name and offers a good consumer experience, people feel safer to use it,” Shah said. For the IPO to be successful, investors will have to see Jumia as “a chance to play in Africa with less risk.” French drinks firm Pernod Ricard SA, the maker of Absolut vodka, invested 75 million euros in December, giving the firm a 5.1 percent stake and vaulting Jumia into unicorn territory with a 1.4 billion euro valuation. Mastercard Inc. followed with an agreement to buy 50-million euros in stock in a private placement alongside the planned IPO. Prior to the offering, Jumia’s biggest shareholder is South African wireless carrier MTN Group Ltd. with a 30 percent stake, followed by Rocket. Other investors include Millicom International Cellular SA, another mobile-phone company operating in parts of Africa, and Goldman Sachs Group Inc. Buenos Aires-based e-commerce firm MercadoLibre Inc. has a similar profile, Shah said. The company also largely beat Amazon to the punch in emerging markets, using a New York share sale in 2007 to expand in Latin America, offering shares at $18 each. The stock now trades above $500 and the group raised $1.85 billion in a fresh share sale last month. Jumia is also expanding its more nascent payment service, JumiaPay. The app, first introduced in 2016, allows shoppers to settle bills over their computer or phone, even if they are more used to cash payments. It’s now used to pay for most of the orders on Jumia’s platform in Nigeria and Egypt, the company said. “There are other online shopping services, but Jumia is definitely No. 1,” said Fofana in Abidjan. “In Ivory Coast, we’re sometimes skeptical about online businesses. Jumia is fast, reliable and all you need to register is a phone number and an email address.”
|
read more |
|
@WPPScangroup reports FY 2018 Earnings EPS +14.167% to pay special dividend here @WPP Kenyan Economy |
Par Value: 1/- Closing Price: 11.70 Total Shares Issued: 432,155,985 Market Capitalization: 5,056,225,024.00 EPS: 1.37 PE: 8.54
The largest marketing services company in East Africa.
WPP Scangroup Limited FY 2018 results through 31st December 2018 vs. 31st December 2017 FY Billings 13.821790b vs. 14.118620b -2.102% FY Revenue 4.504904b vs. 4.122869b +9.266% FY Operating and administrative expenses [3.863870b] vs. [3.710602m] +4.131% FY Operating profit 641.034m vs. 412.267m +55.490% FY Net interest income 291.104m vs. 290.412m +0.238% FY Share of profit in associates 25.131m vs. – FY Impairment of goodwill [21.322m] vs. – FY Foreign exchange losses [5.157m] vs. [27.395m] -81.175% FY Profit before tax 959.888m vs. 696.414m +37.833% FY Profit for the year 612.209m vs. 477.943m +28.092% Profit attributable to equity holders of parent company 554.481m vs. 454.696m +21.945% Profit attributable to NCI 57.728m vs. 23.247m +148.325% Basic and diluted EPS 1.37 vs. 1.20 +14.167% Total Assets 11.240951b vs. 13.758912b -18.301% Total Equity 8.489379b vs. 8.965169b -5.307% Cash & cash equivalents at the end of the year 4.377820b vs. 3.396739b +28.883% Final dividend per share 1.00 vs. 0.75 +33.333% Special dividend 3.00
COMMENTARY
The Group faced a challenging economic environment during 2018 in Kenya, its largest market, as a result of reductions in expenditure by majority of the Group's key clients. This led to a decline in the Group's revenue in the traditional business activities of advertising, media and public relations. On a positive note, there was growth in the digital and technology offering and in research due to the acquisition of TNS Kantar research business in July 2018. Overall Revenue grew by 9.3%. Kenya accounted for 62% of the total, down from the 73% in 2017, primarily on account of TNS Kantar acquisition, which has a sizable presence in Nigeria and West Africa resulting in growth of revenues from Nigeria to 11% of the Group's revenues up from 6%. Costs have been controlled and synergies achieved in all our businesses. Operating profit was up by 55.5% from Ksh412m to Ksh641m. Interest income remained the same despite lower interest rates due to increase in available funds. Overall Profit Before Tax was up 37.8% from Ksh696m to Ksh960m and Profit after Tax was up by 28.1% from Ksh478m to Ksh612m. Share of profit attributable to non-controlling interest increased as a result of 20% minority shareholding in TNS Kantar. Future outlook Based on the year to date performance for 2019, it is expected that there will be an improvement in operating profit for the full year 2019. Proposed Dividend(s) The Board of Directors recommend a Final Dividend of Ksh 1.00 per share [ 2017: Ksh 0.75] for the year ended 31 December 2018 and a Special Dividend of Ksh 3.00 per share, subject to shareholder approval at the annual general meeting to be held on 10 May 2019 and payable to shareholders on the Register of Members at the close of business on 10 May 2019. The dividend will be paid from retained earnings of the company which stood at Ksh 1,794m as at 31 December 2018.
Conclusions
That Special Dividend + the declared dividend = 34.188% of Yield on yesterdays closing price Good to see West Africa beginning to gain Traction. These results and the mouth-watering dividend means we have seen the low for this share.
|
read more |
|
|
|
|