|
Morning Africa |
Register and its all Free.
If you are tracking the NSE Do it via RICHLIVE and use Mozilla Firefox as your Browser. 0930-1500 KENYA TIME Normal Board - The Whole shebang Prompt Board Next day settlement Expert Board All you need re an Individual stock.
The Latest Daily PodCast can be found here on the Front Page of the site http://www.rich.co.ke |
read more |
|
Bond Yields in "tilt" mode - Forever blowing Bubbles Africa |
G7 Government Bond Yields have sunk to record lows. The iconic German Bund [10 Year German Bond] sank to -0.21%. The German Finance Ministry receives 20 Cents per 100 euros of debt as a gift from the investors when they sell 10 Year Bunds, In fact Switzerland is experiencing Negative Bond Yields through 20 Years, Germany, Japan, Denmark, Netherlands through 10 years, Austria, France, Finland through 8 years, Sweden, and Belgium 7 years, Ireland and Slovakia 6 years, Spain, Portugal, Slovenia 5 years and even Italy's 6 month Bills are negative. Of course Japan was the first G7 market to enter ''tilt'' territory and its JGB [Japan 10 Year Bond] remains at -0.10%. This macro gale force level move has pulled US 10-Yr Treasuries to a 20-month low of 2.15% [Last November it was at 3.24%]. Rate markets in the US have now priced in close to 85bp cumulatively of easing by the end of 2020. (via JPM). The US Curve has inverted and typically curve inversions are harbingers of recession. Markets and prices exhibit patterns of correlation and essentially my perspective is that it is the correlation that has exerted a ''Pull'' Effect on US Yields and that therefore the ''recessionary'' Signalling of the Yield Curve should be discounted. There has been a Strong ''Safe Haven'' Demand develop over the last few sessions which has lifted Government Bond Prices, Gold and the Yen. And there is a correlation element to recent Yen strength, Japanese Bond Yields were already negative therefore in the comparison Japanese Yields have become more attractive and given further muscle to the Yen.
It was not too long ago that Everyone was predicting a Weimar Republic outcome or if you are looking for a more recent vintage then dial up Caracas, Khartoum or Harare. Classical Economic Theory predicted that if lashings and lashings of freshly printed money were injected intravenously into the Patient, then the value of money should devalue and inflation run off the charts. Clearly this has not happened. In fact Inflation Gauges are slumping and Inflation is ''Like a patient etherized upon a table'' Trump's Tariff War has spiked earlier ''high jinks'', stock markets have lost ground and Investors have continued to run for cover and ''safe havens'' You will recall Ben Bernanke's riposte when asked why Investors buy Gold
People hold Gold "As protection against what we call tail risks: really, really bad outcomes."
Gold crossed $1,300+ on Friday. Crude Oil got crushed -5.34% Friday capping a -15.87% retreat over the last 4 weeks. Crude Oil is an interesting proxy because its been a Tug of War between sharpened Geopolitical Risk [particularly in the matter of Tehran which sent prices higher] versus concerns around Global Growth and the latter has now overwhelmed the Former. It has turned out that it was not April that was the cruellest month [breeding lilacs out of the dead land, mixing memory and desire, stirring dull roots with spring rain] but May. The Trade War intensified through May and its intensification is best perceived through the Linguistics.
What we also know is that you don't stand in front of a Runaway Freight Train. The Question we need to ask ourselves is how much further this move may run? My sense is that the G7 Bond Markets are now in nose-bleed territory. Whilst I accept that its a 20/80 [US Consumer absorbs 20%, China will have to absorb 80%] of the Tariff Price increase, nevertheless even 20% of a 100 is inflationary. The US Rates and Bond Market looks seriously overcooked to me. However, what we also know is that Markets can stay irrational longer than anyone can stay solvent. Therefore, I would be tentatively selling 85bp of cumulative US easing through 2020 as per JPM. Last week we saw positive EM and Frontier market divergence, which was noteworthy. Lusaka is in unprecedented Territory and the forced nationalisation of Mr. Agarwal's Copper mines might well be a cashew nut moment for President Lungu. Zambian $ Eurobond Yields are at 22%. Thats ''whack''
Let me end with the Madaraka Day Masterstroke announcement. I am sure the Central Bank has visibility on how much Cash is not in circulation. The Announcement might be a catalyst for s short term stimulus as Owners of the ''Jirongos'' try and dispose them. I would have thought the discount is already 20% at the very least. Demonitisation is a very neat Solution. Mohamed Wehliye tweeted
1. It is a one time tax on black money 2. Counterfeiting of 1k down 3. CBK liabilities of Ksh down as a certain percentage of the demonetised 1k will be extinguished - not come back 4. Cash to GDP ratio will go down - 5. % of big denomination re money in circulation down
Its a very clever move and I noticed the President was rather amused by its cleverness.
|
read more |
|
Global Yield Curves Blare Louder Alarms About Economic Prospects Africa |
Alarm bells are ringing louder by the day in bond markets around the world, signaling anxiety about economic prospects is flourishing amid ever-worsening trade tensions.
In the U.S., the 3-month bill’s yield on Friday exceeded the 10-year note’s by a margin last seen in 2007, sounding the loudest recession warning since just before the financial crisis. Germany’s 10-year rates plunged to a new record low well below zero, cutting their premium over two-year securities to the lowest level since 2015. Britain’s yield curve is around its flattest level since the global crisis more than a decade ago, and Canada’s is seeing 2007 levels of inversion.
|
read more |
|
Here's What Could Happen If the Yuan Slips to 7 a Dollar @markets International Trade |
A miserable month for China’s yuan is pressuring officials to decide how much they care about defending 7 a dollar. The currency is down about 2.5% in May, headed for its worst drop since July and the biggest loss in Asia. It touched a five-month low of 6.9217 per dollar a week ago. With the G-20 summit in Japan next month, some strategists see an increasing chance that a trade war escalation could drive the yuan past 7 for the first time in more than a decade. They don’t agree on the consequences. While Citigroup Inc. says a break of the key level may trigger a sell-off in stocks, competitive devaluation and even financial instability, Bank of America Merrill Lynch argues a weaker yuan is justified by slower growth, and that massive outflows aren’t likely. What’s clearer is that risk of intervention is higher when 7 is in sight -- the authorities dumped dollars and mopped up offshore liquidity repeatedly in recent years, and have come out with verbal support for the currency this week. This is the third time the yuan is close to testing that mark in the aftermath of a shock devaluation in 2015. “What’s different this time is the intensification of trade tensions,” said Claudio Piron, co-head of Asian currency and rates strategy at BofAML. “When we look at all the tools that China has at its disposal, an adjustment in the yuan is the easiest one to use. The trick is to achieve it without scaring the rest of Asia.” He added that the yuan may slide to 7.13 if China and the U.S. slap more tariffs on each other’s goods. The odds of a tumble beyond 7 within a year have doubled over the past month to 39% following the recent weakening, according to data compiled by Bloomberg based on option prices. The yuan rose 0.12% to 6.9050 a dollar as of 4:35 p.m. in Shanghai. China’s top banking regulator has warned that traders would suffer “huge losses” if they short the yuan, and the central bank governor vowed to keep the currency stable. The PBOC has said it would issue bills in Hong Kong in the near term, a tool that limits liquidity and can strengthen the offshore yuan. Policy makers have also kept the daily fixing stronger than 6.9, even though the spot rate traded weaker than that level for most of the past week. “I do not think the PBOC has a line in the sand at 7,” he said. “The PBOC may increase its tolerance of a weak renminbi that is driven by market forces.”
|
read more |
|
27-MAY-2019 :: Chinese currency which is -8.8% year on year basis is surely a very visible proxy International Trade |
Chinese currency which is -8.8% year on year basis is surely a very visible proxy. If this all turns ballistic, then this is going to fly through 7.00 and the Chinese will surely use the value as currency as push-back. If they do, they will be pushing an open door. It is clear that directionally money wants to leave China and a great deal of the 2019 surge in Bitcoin is surely correlated to Chinese Flight Capital. Therefore, my prediction is when the currency slides it is going to slide real quick and Dollar Call Options are an interesting risk-adjusted trade.
|
read more |
|
10 NOV 14 ::Ouagadougou's Signal to Sub-Sahara Africa Africa |
What’s clear is that a very young, very informed and very connected African youth demographic [many characterise this as a ‘demographic dividend’] – which for Beautiful Blaise turned into a demographic terminator – is set to alter the existing equilibrium between the rulers and the subjects, and a re-balancing has begun. We need to ask ourselves; how many people can incumbent shoot stone cold dead in such a situation – 100, 1,000, 10,000? This is another point: there is a threshold beyond which the incumbent can’t go. Where that threshold lies will be discovered in the throes of the event. Therefore, the preeminent point to note is that protests in Burkina Faso achieved escape velocity. Overthrowing incumbents is all about acceleration, momentum and speed best characterised by the Ger- man word ‘Blitzkrieg’.
|
read more |
|
With Sudan's street-fighting women Our writer witnesses the unfinished revolution that pushed out a dictator @TheEconomist Africa |
ON APRIL 23rd I stood amid throngs of Sudanese as a train carrying hundreds of people arrived in the heart of Khartoum. The carriages were crammed with passengers from Atbara, the town where anti-government demonstrations had begun five months earlier. They had come to join the swelling ranks of protesters against military rule. As we watched these reinforcements arrive, a fellow journalist remarked that the scene reminded him of Russia in 1917. (He’s an old hand but I don’t think he was there.) More than a century ago Vladimir Ilyich Lenin arrived in Russia on a train from Switzerland, intent on seizing power for the Bolsheviks. Yet, train aside, it is an inapt parallel. For unlike Lenin’s coup d’etat, what I saw in Sudan was peaceful, joyous and leaderless.
As we walked among those on the streets Abbas explained that: “There was an atmosphere of darkness, now there is hope.”
Since most of those at the sit-in were under 30 years old, and since this is 2019, smartphones were everywhere. There was a feedback loop between the online and offline worlds: protesters at the sit-in would take photos and post them on Facebook, which would encourage friends to come down to the site; or they would take videos and have them broadcast on the screen by the main stage. All this intensified the feeling of being part of history.
At the protest I noticed many young couples holding hands. Such public displays of intimacy may have been dangerous under the old regime. In protests in Cairo in 2011 there were reports of sexual assaults. Here in Khartoum, though, the atmosphere struck me as different, more wholesome. In some ways it resembled the Tiananmen Square protests in China in 1989, where young couples were unofficially married at the sites of sit-ins.
Talking to Abbas after the Atbara train passed I wondered aloud whether the mood was too celebratory, too soon. He said, politely, that I should not confuse elation of with a sense of a job completed. “We Sudanese”, he said, “we cover pain with joy.”
|
read more |
|
Empire builder Assessing Vincent Bollore @TheEconomist Africa |
Who is france’s greatest capitalist? Americans might think this question is the beginning of a joke. Those who take it seriously may finger Vincent Bolloré, who over nearly four decades has built an empire spanning African ports and French pipelines, pay-tv, electric cars, the world’s biggest music label and much else besides. On May 29th the 67-year-old stepped down from the board of Bolloré sa, the holding company at his complex empire’s core. At an annual meeting outside Paris, he air-kissed fawning shareholders one last time and, as a parting gift, gave each one three bottles of wine (from a Bolloré vineyard).
With sales of €23bn ($25.6bn) and 81,000 employees around the globe, Bolloré Group testifies to its boss’s knack for business. A more sober assessment of his reign reveals a complicated legacy. The tycoon emerges as a flawed exemplar of capitalism. His heirs should draw lessons.
Though from 1822 five generations had built a Bolloré bible-and-cigarette-paper concern in Brittany, Vincent is what the French call un self-made man. In 1981, still in his 20s, he paid a couple of francs for the family concern, which had fallen into the hands of its creditors—a quixotic move for an up-and-coming investment banker.
Mr Bolloré’s dynastic industrial ambitions, admired in French business circles, were soon paired with stockmarket raids à l’américaine, which were not. Not for him the polite ways of Parisian business, nor its endless cocktail circuit. He is part activist investor, part private-equity financier in a country which has little love for either; a corporate “pirate” eyeing the shareholder registers of august companies, whose family owners did not appreciate it. Some fell under his control, such as a shipping group that then formed the backbone of a logistics operation which now runs 16 container terminals in Africa. Others, like Bouygues, a construction group, and Lazard, a blue-blooded bank, persuaded less outré parties to buy his stake at a hefty premium. Stodgy French capitalism can use an outsider to shake it up. But Mr Bolloré’s norm-flouting has a less laudable side. For one thing, his touch is not as golden as some make it out to be. He has on occasion ridden roughshod over the principles of modern corporate governance. Lastly, he and Bolloré sa face charges of corruption, which both deny.
Start with the business. Mr Bolloré is a risk-taker of the sort every economy needs. Investors who bought shares in Bolloré sa 30 years ago, soon after it listed, have made their money back 40 times over, compared with eight times for France’s cac 40 blue-chip index. Its market capitalisation is now €12bn. The empire around it comprises 457 businesses. A simple total of their market caps gets to nearly €70bn. The three main pillars are logistics, batteries and media.
The logistics and pipelines business has been the most successful. It includes ports in Africa, where Bolloré sa says it has invested €4bn, plus a freight-forwarding arm, three African rail concessions and French oil terminals. Analysts value it at €8bn or so, roughly half of Bolloré sa’s value including debt. It faces stiffer competition than it did, but margins are healthy.
Those profits appear mostly to have been offset by losses from another transport bet: on a new type of lithium battery developed by a plastics operation which complemented the old paper business. Its only big customer has been a car-sharing scheme in Paris, Autolib’, which was run by Bolloré before collapsing in a heap of debt last year. The battery venture is now eyeing electric buses. It is worth perhaps one-tenth of the €3bn sunk into it.
Vivendi, a media behemoth in which Bolloré sa owns a 26% stake worth around €8bn, has been a mixed bag. Mr Bolloré took control of the group in 2014, fulfilling a long-rumoured ambition to become a media baron. Universal Music Group, which is wholly owned by Vivendi but run at arm’s length from California, has prospered as streaming revenues from Lady Gaga, u2 and its other stars have soared. Its value is thought to have swelled from $8bn in 2014 to $30bn—more or less Vivendi’s market capitalisation. Vivendi has gained just €7bn in that period, reflecting poorer performance at other parts of the group. Canal+ has struggled to retain French pay-tv viewers in the age of Netflix; Havas looks too small to compete with pr-and-advertising rivals like wpp and Omnicom.
Mr Bolloré’s expansion into Italy, in a bid to create a southern European content-and-distribution giant, has been costliest. Since 2015-16 Vivendi has tried to seize control of Mediaset, Silvio Berlusconi’s broadcasting empire, and Telecom Italia, a mobile operator. These bets have misfired: Mediaset’s share price has fallen by a quarter and Telecom Italia’s by nearly two-thirds since Mr Bolloré built stakes in them. A €1.1bn hit in the value of its Telecom Italia holdings all but wiped out Vivendi’s net profits last year (other holdings rose in value). As analysts at Morgan Stanley, a bank, recently put it, “great music story, unappealing wrapper”.
As a result of these misadventures, Bolloré sa has lost shareholders money in the past five years, even as the cac 40 has gained 40%. Such, Mr Bolloré’s defenders might reasonably argue, is the nature of risk-taking. Fair enough. But the wrapper has other unappealing qualities.
Bolloré’s corporate structure would put Byzantium to shame (see graphic on previous page). At its heart is a corporate mille-feuille, where Mr Bolloré and his family control a company that holds the majority stake in a firm that in turn owns most of another, and so on. Alongside this sit companies that do actual business, including Vivendi. Such a model, which is not unique in France, allows minority investors to be brought in while a central shareholder—in this case Mr Bolloré—maintains control.
What sets Mr Bolloré’s layer cake apart from similar ones is that those minority shareholders are often other companies in it. Bolloré sa part-owns at least ten companies with direct and indirect stakes in its own majority shareholder, Financière de l’Odet, and its parents. When a company pays a dividend, the money loops through a few holding companies before some of it returns to its own bank account. Several of the holding companies are listed but at least 90% owned by Bolloré entities.
Analysts attribute over a third of Bolloré sa’s market value to shareholdings in its parents; these parents are also worth around €12bn in total. That does odd things to Bolloré sa accounts. When its value falls (like last year, when its shares lost 24%), that of the holding companies above it dips too. Because Bolloré sa in turn owns them, its balance-sheet and income must be adjusted downwards. This then affects metrics used to calculate the value of its shares, whose fall prompts a further adjustment. Share-price rises cause upward revisions.
In 2015 Muddy Waters, a hedge fund which specialises in arcane companies, said the rococo empire was too complicated to be modelled in an Excel spreadsheet. Analysts and investors with the patience to track Bolloré sa disagree over basic things, such as who exactly is entitled to the profits generated by the underlying operations.
Universal income All this makes it hard to gauge the Bolloré empire’s financial condition. It reports net debt equal to a healthy 17% of equity. This, though, assumes debts owed by one company in the structure can be repaid with cash held in another part. Bolloré sa’s accounts subsume all those of (much larger) Vivendi—not just the proportion, 26%, which it owns. Such consolidation is perfectly legal, for Bolloré sa controls Vivendi. But its claim on Vivendi’s cashflows would be as owner of a 26% stake, not of 100%.
Information is patchy on where in the organigram debts sit (Bolloré says all the holding companies contain cash). Pierre-Yves Gauthier of AlphaValue, a research house, has spoken of “looming potential stress” in the structure. With €10.3bn in gross debt and €4.8bn in cash at end of 2018, its position looks reasonable. Its earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortisation were just under €1bn last year even before adding in Vivendi’s. The accounts of Omnium, near the top of the structure, paint a different picture. These consolidate the group but in effect strip out the cross-shareholding loops. They show net debt of €5.6bn supported by equity (excluding outsiders’ stakes) of just €482m at end 2018—gearing of over 1,000%.
Such leverage is sustainable so long as cash keeps flowing into the system. Some observers suspect this is why Mr Bolloré has pursued ever-bigger companies with ever-bigger balance-sheets, like Vivendi. The company has been generating lots of cash by selling assets accumulated in an ill-fated acquisition spree initiated in the early 2000s. Under Mr Bolloré’s leadership, Vivendi paid fat dividends, which helped service debts that paid for his takeover of it. It is now considering the sale of up to half of Universal. That would let Vivendi send as much as $8bn to the Bolloré structure.
Critics who worry that Vivendi is run for the benefit of Mr Bolloré and not its other shareholders point to such machinations as evidence. In June 2017 the purchase by Vivendi of Bolloré businesses’ 59% stake in Havas transferred €2.3bn in cash from Vivendi’s coffers into those of Bolloré entities, which owned around 20% of Vivendi at the time. Analysts questioned both the deal’s rationale and price. Independent experts have decried worsening corporate governance at Vivendi (to match Bolloré sa).
Other bits of the business have attracted the gaze of the authorities. In April 2018 preliminary criminal charges were brought against Mr Bolloré, other Bolloré executives, and later Bolloré sa, in relation to corruption in Togo and Guinea. French investigating magistrates suspect them of sending Havas spin-doctors to work in the countries’ election campaigns. According to the charges, it was Bolloré businesses that footed much of the bill, not the politicians to whom the services were rendered. (Bolloré says it paid for bona fide work carried out.) Bolloré sa is said to have gained business after the politicians won. Mr Bolloré, who was briefly detained for questioning at the time, may face prison time if found guilty. Mr Bolloré, Bolloré sa and the other executives all deny the allegations.
Many Bolloré ventures—ports, broadcasting—depend on government goodwill. In Africa Mr Bolloré and his businesses have maintained close links with current and former politicians. “He is a friend. I favour friends. And so what?” Guinea’s president, Alpha Condé, told Le Monde in 2016. Bolloré sa has recruited from France’s network of former ministers, spooks and other grandees, often with tangled business ties in its former colonies. Critics allege Mr Bolloré has skewed the coverage of his tv channels and newspapers in favour of politicians vital to his business interests.
Mr Bolloré keeps close to French power, too. After winning the French presidential election in 2007, Nicolas Sarkozy holidayed on Mr Bolloré’s yacht. “I’ve known Vincent Bolloré for 20 years,” Mr Sarkozy explained at the time. Mr Bolloré’s son, Yannick, has called the current president, Emmanuel Macron, “a friend”. Bolloré père has reportedly lobbied the French state to keep its 3% stake in Vivendi.
Mr Bolloré and Bolloré sa deny any impropriety in all these relationships. As for corporate governance, people close to Mr Bolloré dismiss concerns as specifically Anglo-Saxon. Family groups are lauded in Europe as long-term investors who see beyond quarterly earnings. Mr Bolloré has made no secret that his son Cyrille, 33, who chairs Bolloré sa, or Yannick, 39, who chairs Vivendi, will be in charge one day (a third son is not active in the business; a younger daughter is in its lower echelons).
For now, despite stepping off the board of Bolloré sa, the patriarch remains the real boss. He retains positions—and influence—throughout the mille-feuille. He still calls the shots at both Bolloré and Vivendi. For years he has promised to relinquish all positions in 2022, when he turns 70 and the family business turns 200. Several Bolloré investors worry that the untested sons lack their father’s track record. Given the elder Mr Bolloré’s controversial tenure, others may see that as a virtue.
|
read more |
|
Tanzania Investment Centre (TIC) has organised a forum whose key aim is to attract domestic and international investors in cashew nut sector @The_EastAfrican Kenyan Economy |
Tanzania Investment Centre (TIC) has organised a forum whose key aim is to attract domestic and international investors in cashew nut sector, which is witnessing an average growth of 450 per cent annually. Geoffrey Mwambe, TIC executive director said they are seeking to establish cashew nut processing projects and industrial parks mainly in Lindi and Mtwara regions. The search for processors comes at a time when the Tanzanian government is still holding a huge stock of cashew nuts estimated at 200,000 tonnes it bought from farmers in November last year after it failed to secure foreign buyers. The government opted to buy all harvests after private buyers failed to up their prices as demanded by President John Pombe Magufuli.
|
read more |
|
Rejection of @BarrickGold bid is 'no brainer', top @AcaciaMining investor says @ReutersAfrica Africa |
fidelity International, one of the largest shareholders in Acacia Mining, said on Friday Barrick Gold’s low bid to buy the Acacia shares it does not already own showed a lack of judgment and it was a “no brainer” to reject it. Barrick Gold spun off Acacia into a separate company in 2010, but owns 63.9% of it. Barrick has said the offer level reflects the risk of operating in Tanzania and it has until June 18 to turn the indicative bid into a firm offer. Barrick had no further comment on Friday. Fidelity International said the bid was around 50% too low. “We are definitely not going to accept the offer,” Alexander Wright, portfolio manager at Fidelity International, Acacia’s sixth biggest investor according to Refinitiv data, told Reuters. “At this price it’s a complete no brainer not to accept it.” In the absence of a finalised deal with Tanzania, Acacia is expecting to go ahead with an international arbitration hearing in July, with an outcome expected by the end of this year. Acacia’s shares reached a peak above 6 pounds in 2016 and have plunged to less than 2 pounds, although they rallied in February on the announcement of the proposed settlement and better than expected output.
|
read more |
|
|
|
|